I write from the slow, steady place where memory and conscience meet, listening to the hush between waves and the echo of a song that asks a simple question: where do the children play? That question has widened for me into something larger and darker — a question about what we build and what we destroy, about the habits of a civilization that can manufacture wonders and horrors with equal skill.
My voice here is for those who want to think and feel together, to hold history and hope in the same hand while we consider how genocide has shaped the world and what peacebuilding must become.
Progress Seen Through a Child’s Eyes
We celebrate progress as if it is a neutral fact: taller buildings, faster planes, new technologies. I confess I have admired those things.
Yet when I imagine a child looking out at our world, the scene shifts. Roads slice through fields that once held childhood games. Skyscrapers block the horizon where kites used to fly.
The question from the song — where do the children play — becomes a moral mirror: for whom did we make this world, and who was pushed out of it?
The Quiet Violence of Erasure
Genocide is not only the immediate horror of mass killing; it is the slow work of erasure that persists through generations. Language, stories, landscapes, and songs are stolen. Entire ways of being are made invisible.
I feel that loss like a tidal pull: it empties rooms where laughter should live and replaces memory with a silence that resists easy repair. This silence is part of the architecture we build when we prioritize conquest, extraction, and domination.
How Genocide Reshapes Our Commons
When a people are torn from place, the common life — the “where” of play, celebration, mourning, and growth — is fractured. Public spaces become contested, histories become contested, and the very idea of shared future frays.
Infrastructure meant to serve everyone often serves the few; policies that profess inclusion can carry the residue of exclusion. The consequences ripple outward: diminished trust between communities, trauma that passes from parents to children, and a global conscience hardened by repetition.
Peacebuilding as Repair and Imagination
Peacebuilding must be more than treaties and tribunals; it must be imaginative repair. Repair begins with naming what was lost and listening to those who inherited the wound.
It includes restoring languages and practices, redesigning public spaces so they nurture rather than erase, and re-teaching histories with humility. It requires economic and political choices that prioritize human dignity over short-term gain.
Above all, peacebuilding is a moral apprenticeship in empathy: learning to make decisions guided by the question of where the children will play, who will teach them, and what songs they will inherit.
Practical Compassion
To move from grief to responsibility, I suggest we center three practical acts in our civic and personal lives:
- Listen with patience to survivors and descendants, allowing their memories to shape policy and pedagogy.
- Preserve and restore culture and place through memorials, language revival, and community guardianship of land and sites.
- Design policies that redistribute power and resources so that public spaces, education, and healthcare reflect shared stewardship rather than exclusion.
Closing
The refrain — we have come a long way — feels hollow if we measure distance only in steel and speed.
Real progress is measured by how we protect the tender things: the capacity to play, to dream, and to pass on a story that affirms life.
If genocide carved holes through the commons, then peacebuilding must be the patient work of sewing them closed, stitch by stitch, with justice, memory, and imagination.
Where will the children play in the next generation of our making? I propose we choose places made for belonging.
Leave a comment